2012, ISBN: 1231164182

[EAN: 9781231164181], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing… More...

[EAN: 9781231164181], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1883 Excerpt: .humbly advise Her Majesty to affirm the decree of the High Court, and to dismiss the appeal, the costs of which will be paid by the Appellant. Solicitors for Appellant: Lambert, Fetch, Shakespear. Solicitor for Respondents: T. L. Wilson. J. a BALWANT RAO BISHWANT CHANDRA ) Plaintiff; 1883 CHOR Feb. 27. /tflt/funLtfj ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT AT ALLAHABAD. Limitation--Act IX. of 1871, ss. 10, 118,123, and 145--Suit to obtain or control the Management of a Religious Endowment. Sect. 10 of Act IX. of 1871 applies to cases where the property in suit is being used for some purpose other than that of the trusts to which it is applicable, not to cases where the Defendant adjnits he is trustee, and the Plaintiff without proving misapplication brings a suit more than twelve years after the cause of action arose, to obtain or control the management. Such a suit if it doe not fall within s. 123 or s. 145 of the same Act (by fly /Wy-1 r-o either of which a twelve years period is provided) is barred in six years JLf /b under s. 118. /z/Uf 4 /15 A APPEAL from a judgment of the High Court (Feb. 10, 1879), jbl which reversed a judgment of the Subordinate Judge of Agra imiM+J-bib (March 30,1878).--rf, a 4H7 e Appelant sued to remove the Respondent from the ItAlhiUrtL Lr management of the worship and service performed at the temple 2-/J--J4 of Thakur Ganeshji and the management of the garden; to-JU-J remove the power and control of the Respondent from the temple, /isjt( garden, and mouzah Mandesi; and to be declared authorized to jC iifi appoint a second manager for the purpose of carrying out the jnjj-j /objects of the endowment. filVn / The Respondent by his written statement contended that the jiijiitfM suit was barred by l.<

2012, ISBN: 1231164182

[EAN: 9781231164181], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing … More...

[EAN: 9781231164181], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1883 Excerpt: .humbly advise Her Majesty to affirm the decree of the High Court, and to dismiss the appeal, the costs of which will be paid by the Appellant. Solicitors for Appellant: Lambert, Fetch, Shakespear. Solicitor for Respondents: T. L. Wilson. J. a BALWANT RAO BISHWANT CHANDRA ) Plaintiff; 1883 CHOR Feb. 27. /tflt/funLtfj ON APPEAL FROM THE HIGH COURT AT ALLAHABAD. Limitation--Act IX. of 1871, ss. 10, 118,123, and 145--Suit to obtain or control the Management of a Religious Endowment. Sect. 10 of Act IX. of 1871 applies to cases where the property in suit is being used for some purpose other than that of the trusts to which it is applicable, not to cases where the Defendant adjnits he is trustee, and the Plaintiff without proving misapplication brings a suit more than twelve years after the cause of action arose, to obtain or control the management. Such a suit if it doe not fall within s. 123 or s. 145 of the same Act (by fly /Wy-1 r-o either of which a twelve years period is provided) is barred in six years JLf /b under s. 118. /z/Uf 4 /15 A APPEAL from a judgment of the High Court (Feb. 10, 1879), jbl which reversed a judgment of the Subordinate Judge of Agra imiM+J-bib (March 30,1878).--rf, a 4H7 e Appelant sued to remove the Respondent from the ItAlhiUrtL Lr management of the worship and service performed at the temple 2-/J--J4 of Thakur Ganeshji and the management of the garden; to-JU-J remove the power and control of the Respondent from the temple, /isjt( garden, and mouzah Mandesi; and to be declared authorized to jC iifi appoint a second manager for the purpose of carrying out the jnjj-j /objects of the endowment. filVn / The Respondent by his written statement contended that the jiijiitfM suit was barred by l.<