2012, ISBN: 1130380246

[EAN: 9781130380248], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers c… More...

[EAN: 9781130380248], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1907 Excerpt: .were observed 225 feet beneath the main coal beds, and suggest the condition observed in the railroad-cut section at Evanston. The minor lithologic differences of these beds are clearly of less importance than the general relation between the Evanston and Almy. Lesquereux,6 Bannister, c and Coped all concluded that the two formations are entirely conformable. Emmons and King, of the Fortieth Parallel Survey, considered the conglomerate o Lesquereux, Leo, Rept. U. S. Geol. Survey Terr., vol. 7, 1878, Tertiary Flora, p. lit. The lower part of the section was compiled by Professor Lesquereux from the nport of Iir. A. Feale, Fifth Ann. Prelim. Rept. U. S. Geol. Survey Montana. 1871, 1872, p. 195. ti Sixth Ann. Rept. U. S. Geol. Survey Terr. 1872, 1873, p. 338. The conformability of the strata is especially leimirkable at Evanston and easily recognized along the hills facing the river. If, as it has been supposed, thisconglomi erate formation was more recent and had covered strata of different groups, this alternance of conglomenite with sandstone strata in perfect accordance with the soft bituminous clay beds which they overlie is uncxplainable." Sixth Ann. Rept. U. 8. Geol. Survey Terr. 1872, 1873, p.541. d Seventh Ann. Rept. V. 8. Geol. and (ieog. Survey Terr, for 1873, 1874, p. 441; Rept. U. S. Geol. ami Geog. Survey Terr., vol. 2, 1875, pp. 3(1-40. and coal-bearing beds a unit and mapped the whole as Laramie." White likewise considered the Evanston and Almy beds as belonging to the same formation, but referred them both to the Wasatch.6 Stanton, in 1892, followed White in combining the Evanston and Almy, and referred both to the Wasatch group, c but in 1896 expressed the view that the Evanston beds represent the upper part of the Adaville and that.<