Removing the Commons examines the moral condition in which people can remove--through either use or appropriation--natural resources from the commons. This task begins with a robust defen… More...
Removing the Commons examines the moral condition in which people can remove--through either use or appropriation--natural resources from the commons. This task begins with a robust defense of the view that natural resources initially belong to all people. Granting that natural resources initially belong to all people, it follows that all people have a claim that limits the way in which others may go about taking or removing natural resources from the commons. In assessing these limitations, Eric Roark argues for a Lockean left-libertarian theory of justice in which all people have the right of self-ownership and may only remove natural resources from the commons if they adhere to the Lockean Proviso by leaving “enough and as good” for others. Roark’s account goes beyond existing treatments of the Lockean Proviso by insisting that the duty to leave enough and as good for others applies not merely to those who appropriate natural resources from the commons, but also to those who use natural resources within the commons. Removing the Commons defends a Georgist interpretation of the Lockean Proviso in which those who remove natural resources from the commons must pay the competitive rent of their removal in a fashion that best promotes equal opportunity for welfare. Finally, Roark gives extended consideration to the implications that the developed Lockean Left-Libertarian account of removing natural resources from the commons poses toward both global poverty and environmental degradation. Digital Content>E-books>Philosophy>Philosophy>Philosophy, Lexington Books Digital >16<
BarnesandNoble.com
new in stock. Shipping costs:zzgl. Versandkosten., plus shipping costs Details...
(*) Book out-of-stock means that the book is currently not available at any of the associated platforms we search.
Removing the Commons examines the moral condition in which people can remove-through either USE or appropriation-natural resources from the commons. This task begins with a robust defense… More...
Removing the Commons examines the moral condition in which people can remove-through either USE or appropriation-natural resources from the commons. This task begins with a robust defense of the view that natural resources initially belong to all people. Granting that natural resources initially belong to all people, it follows that all people have a claim that limits the way in which others may go about taking or removing natural resources from the commons. In assessing these limitations, Eric Roark argues for a Lockean left-libertarian theory of justice in which all people have the right of self-ownership and may only remove natural resources from the commons if they adhere to the Lockean Proviso by leaving ';enough and as good' for others. Roark's account goes beyond existing treatments of the Lockean Proviso by insisting that the duty to leave enough and as good for others applies not merely to those who appropriate natural resources from the commons, but also to those who USE natural resources within the commons. Removing the Commons defends a Georgist interpretation of the Lockean Proviso in which those who remove natural resources from the commons must pay the competitive rent of their removal in a fashion that best promotes equal opportunity for welfare. Finally, Roark gives extended consideration to the implications that the developed Lockean Left-Libertarian account of removing natural resources from the commons poses toward both global poverty and environmental degradation. eBooks Removing The Commons~~EBook~~9780739174692~~Eric Roark Removing The Commons<
Removing the Commons defends a Lockean Left-Libertarian account of the moral conditions in which people may remove, either via use or appropriation, natural resources from the commons. I … More...
Removing the Commons defends a Lockean Left-Libertarian account of the moral conditions in which people may remove, either via use or appropriation, natural resources from the commons. I conclude that self-owning agents may remove natural resources from the commons just so long as they leave others the competitive value of their removal in a way that best affords others an equal opportunity for welfare.; EPUB; Politics, Philosphy & Religion > Philosophy, Wiley<
hive.co.uk
No. 9780739174692. Shipping costs:Instock, Despatched same working day before 3pm, zzgl. Versandkosten., plus shipping costs Details...
(*) Book out-of-stock means that the book is currently not available at any of the associated platforms we search.
A Lockean Left-Libertarian Approach to the Just Use and Appropriation of Natural Resources, eBooks, eBook Download (EPUB), [PU: Lexington Books], Lexington Books, 2013
Removing the Commons examines the moral condition in which people can remove--through either use or appropriation--natural resources from the commons. This task begins with a robust defen… More...
Removing the Commons examines the moral condition in which people can remove--through either use or appropriation--natural resources from the commons. This task begins with a robust defense of the view that natural resources initially belong to all people. Granting that natural resources initially belong to all people, it follows that all people have a claim that limits the way in which others may go about taking or removing natural resources from the commons. In assessing these limitations, Eric Roark argues for a Lockean left-libertarian theory of justice in which all people have the right of self-ownership and may only remove natural resources from the commons if they adhere to the Lockean Proviso by leaving “enough and as good” for others. Roark’s account goes beyond existing treatments of the Lockean Proviso by insisting that the duty to leave enough and as good for others applies not merely to those who appropriate natural resources from the commons, but also to those who use natural resources within the commons. Removing the Commons defends a Georgist interpretation of the Lockean Proviso in which those who remove natural resources from the commons must pay the competitive rent of their removal in a fashion that best promotes equal opportunity for welfare. Finally, Roark gives extended consideration to the implications that the developed Lockean Left-Libertarian account of removing natural resources from the commons poses toward both global poverty and environmental degradation. Digital Content>E-books>Philosophy>Philosophy>Philosophy, Lexington Books Digital >16<
new in stock. Shipping costs:zzgl. Versandkosten., plus shipping costs
Removing the Commons examines the moral condition in which people can remove-through either USE or appropriation-natural resources from the commons. This task begins with a robust defense… More...
Removing the Commons examines the moral condition in which people can remove-through either USE or appropriation-natural resources from the commons. This task begins with a robust defense of the view that natural resources initially belong to all people. Granting that natural resources initially belong to all people, it follows that all people have a claim that limits the way in which others may go about taking or removing natural resources from the commons. In assessing these limitations, Eric Roark argues for a Lockean left-libertarian theory of justice in which all people have the right of self-ownership and may only remove natural resources from the commons if they adhere to the Lockean Proviso by leaving ';enough and as good' for others. Roark's account goes beyond existing treatments of the Lockean Proviso by insisting that the duty to leave enough and as good for others applies not merely to those who appropriate natural resources from the commons, but also to those who USE natural resources within the commons. Removing the Commons defends a Georgist interpretation of the Lockean Proviso in which those who remove natural resources from the commons must pay the competitive rent of their removal in a fashion that best promotes equal opportunity for welfare. Finally, Roark gives extended consideration to the implications that the developed Lockean Left-Libertarian account of removing natural resources from the commons poses toward both global poverty and environmental degradation. eBooks Removing The Commons~~EBook~~9780739174692~~Eric Roark Removing The Commons<
Removing the Commons defends a Lockean Left-Libertarian account of the moral conditions in which people may remove, either via use or appropriation, natural resources from the commons. I … More...
Removing the Commons defends a Lockean Left-Libertarian account of the moral conditions in which people may remove, either via use or appropriation, natural resources from the commons. I conclude that self-owning agents may remove natural resources from the commons just so long as they leave others the competitive value of their removal in a way that best affords others an equal opportunity for welfare.; EPUB; Politics, Philosphy & Religion > Philosophy, Wiley<
No. 9780739174692. Shipping costs:Instock, Despatched same working day before 3pm, zzgl. Versandkosten., plus shipping costs
A Lockean Left-Libertarian Approach to the Just Use and Appropriation of Natural Resources, eBooks, eBook Download (EPUB), [PU: Lexington Books], Lexington Books, 2013
1As some platforms do not transmit shipping conditions to us and these may depend on the country of delivery, the purchase price, the weight and size of the item, a possible membership of the platform, a direct delivery by the platform or via a third-party provider (Marketplace), etc., it is possible that the shipping costs indicated by find-more-books.com / find-more-books.com do not correspond to those of the offering platform.
Book in our database since 2007-07-23T01:44:20-04:00 (New York) Detail page last modified on 2021-09-05T15:05:15-04:00 (New York) ISBN/EAN: 9780739174692
ISBN - alternate spelling: 978-0-7391-7469-2 Alternate spelling and related search-keywords: Book author: linklater Book title: appropriation
More/other books that might be very similar to this book
