ISBN: 1235995291

[EAN: 9781235995293], Neubuch, [PU: RareBooksClub], ALPHEUS CROSBY,EUROPE,WORLD, This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 82 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 0.2in.This historic boo… More...

[EAN: 9781235995293], Neubuch, [PU: RareBooksClub], ALPHEUS CROSBY,EUROPE,WORLD, This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 82 pages. Dimensions: 9.7in. x 7.4in. x 0.2in.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1873 Excerpt: . . . took the primary endings; the past complete tense (the Pluperfect), the augment and the secondary endings; and the future complete tense (the Future Perfect), the common future affixes. In the Perf. and Plup. , the objective endings were affixed without a connecting vowel; and, of course, with many euphonic changes: as, Te-rpififiat rirpififuu, ri-ray-uai, ire-Teid-pat Triwetap. a. 1 (39). The subjective endings appear to have been at first appended in the same way: thus, Perf. Ind. yeypap-p, Inf. yeypap-vat, Part. yeypap-vrs. But all these forms were forbidden by euphony. Hence in the Ind. -i became-o; and after this change the inflection of the Ind. proceeded according to the analogy of the Aor. , except so far as the primary form differs from the secondary: yeypap-a yeypa(p-a, as, -e, -a-p. ev, -a-re, -a-vr, -a-rov. In the Part. , v also became a, which by precession passed into o (114; indeed, in Dec. 3 no masculine or feminine noun has a stem ending in-or-, 177. 3): yeypatp-ors. The v in the Inf. , instead of a similar change (as it was followed by o), took-t-before it: yeypap-evat. In the Plup. act. , there was a kind of double augment, prefixing t, both to the reduplication, and also to the connecting vowel of the Perf. , making the connective of the Plup. ea (derived by some from the Impf. of clfd to be): i-yeypa(p-ea. This ca remained in the Ionic; but in the old Attic was contracted into H, which afterwards passed by precession into a. The flexive v was then added in the 1 Pers. , according to the general analogy. f. The fuller tense-system of the Latin has marked analogies to the Greek: as in the old futures capso, fa(c-so)xo; in such Aorist-Perfects as di(c-si)xi, scri(h-si)psi, lu(d-si)si; in such reduplicated forms as cucurri, pependi, poposci, and c. Yet it. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN.<

2012, ISBN: 1235995291

[EAN: 9781235995293], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing… More...

[EAN: 9781235995293], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****. This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1873 Excerpt: .took the primary endings; the past complete tense (the Pluperfect), the augment and the secondary endings; and the future complete tense (the Future Perfect), the common future affixes. In the Perf. and Plup., the objective endings were affixed without a connecting vowel; and, of course, with many euphonic changes: as, Te-rpififiat rirpififuu, ri-ray-uai, ire-Teid-pat Triwetap.a.1 (39). The subjective endings appear to have been at first appended in the same way: thus, Perf. Ind. yeypap-p, Inf. yeypap-vat, Part. yeypap-vrs. But all these forms were forbidden by euphony. Hence in the Ind.-i became-o; and after this change the inflection of the Ind. proceeded according to the analogy of the Aor., except so far as the primary form differs from the secondary: yeypap-a yeypa(p-a, as, -e, -a-p.ev, -a-re, -a-vr, -a-rov. In the Part., v also became a, which by precession passed into o (114; indeed, in Dec. 3 no masculine or feminine noun has a stem ending in-or-, 177. 3): yeypatp-ors. The v in the Inf., instead of a similar change (as it was followed by o), took-t-before it: yeypap-evat. In the Plup. act., there was a kind of double augment, prefixing t, both to the reduplication, and also to the connecting vowel of the Perf., making the connective of the Plup. ea (derived by some from the Impf. of clfd to be): i-yeypa(p-ea. This ca remained in the Ionic; but in the old Attic was contracted into H, which afterwards passed by precession into a. The flexive v was then added in the 1 Pers., according to the general analogy. f. The fuller tense-system of the Latin has marked analogies to the Greek: as in the old futures capso, fa(c-so)xo; in such Aorist-Perfects as di(c-si)xi, scri(h-si)psi, lu(d-si)si; in such reduplicated forms as cucurri, pependi, poposci, c. Yet it.<

2012, ISBN: 1235995291

[EAN: 9781235995293], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing … More...

[EAN: 9781235995293], Neubuch, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com, United States], Language: English Brand New Book ***** Print on Demand *****.This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1873 Excerpt: .took the primary endings; the past complete tense (the Pluperfect), the augment and the secondary endings; and the future complete tense (the Future Perfect), the common future affixes. In the Perf. and Plup., the objective endings were affixed without a connecting vowel; and, of course, with many euphonic changes: as, Te-rpififiat rirpififuu, ri-ray-uai, ire-Teid-pat Triwetap.a.1 (39). The subjective endings appear to have been at first appended in the same way: thus, Perf. Ind. yeypap-p, Inf. yeypap-vat, Part. yeypap-vrs. But all these forms were forbidden by euphony. Hence in the Ind.-i became-o; and after this change the inflection of the Ind. proceeded according to the analogy of the Aor., except so far as the primary form differs from the secondary: yeypap-a yeypa(p-a, as, -e, -a-p.ev, -a-re, -a-vr, -a-rov. In the Part., v also became a, which by precession passed into o (114; indeed, in Dec. 3 no masculine or feminine noun has a stem ending in-or-, 177. 3): yeypatp-ors. The v in the Inf., instead of a similar change (as it was followed by o), took-t-before it: yeypap-evat. In the Plup. act., there was a kind of double augment, prefixing t, both to the reduplication, and also to the connecting vowel of the Perf., making the connective of the Plup. ea (derived by some from the Impf. of clfd to be): i-yeypa(p-ea. This ca remained in the Ionic; but in the old Attic was contracted into H, which afterwards passed by precession into a. The flexive v was then added in the 1 Pers., according to the general analogy. f. The fuller tense-system of the Latin has marked analogies to the Greek: as in the old futures capso, fa(c-so)xo; in such Aorist-Perfects as di(c-si)xi, scri(h-si)psi, lu(d-si)si; in such reduplicated forms as cucurri, pependi, poposci, c. Yet it.<

ISBN: 9781235995293

Paperback, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com]